<p><strong>Buckingham Palace</strong> and the <strong>British government</strong> are facing mounting calls to formally remove <strong>Prince Andrew&rsquo;s remaining royal titles</strong> after new revelations about his long-standing ties to the late financier and convicted sex offender <strong>Jeffrey Epstein</strong>.</p>

<p>The latest public outcry follows reports that previously unseen documents and witness statements have surfaced in the U.S., shedding further light on the Duke of York&rsquo;s association with Epstein and raising questions about whether Andrew misled investigators about the extent of their relationship.</p>

<h3><strong>Renewed Public and Political Pressure</strong></h3>

<p>Campaign groups, royal watchers, and several members of Parliament have demanded that the Palace and the government take decisive action, arguing that Andrew&rsquo;s continued possession of royal titles tarnishes the reputation of the <strong>British monarchy</strong>.</p>

<blockquote>
<p>&ldquo;The monarchy cannot afford to appear indifferent to the moral standards it represents,&rdquo; said <strong>Labour MP Emma Dent Coad</strong>, who renewed her call for Andrew&rsquo;s removal from public life. &ldquo;Keeping his titles sends the wrong message at a time when accountability is essential.&rdquo;</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Prince Andrew, 65, <strong>stepped back from public duties</strong> in 2019 after his BBC <em>Newsnight</em> interview drew widespread criticism for his lack of remorse and perceived evasiveness about his friendship with Epstein. In 2022, he was stripped of his <strong>HRH (His Royal Highness)</strong> status and <strong>military patronages</strong>, but he retained the <strong>title Duke of York</strong> and remains a <strong>Knight of the Garter</strong> &mdash; distinctions that continue to draw public anger.</p>

<h3><strong>The Epstein Connection Resurfaces</strong></h3>

<p>Epstein&rsquo;s criminal history and subsequent death in 2019 continue to reverberate across both sides of the Atlantic. Newly released court materials related to civil cases against Epstein&rsquo;s estate have renewed scrutiny of Prince Andrew&rsquo;s interactions with the disgraced financier and his inner circle.</p>

<p>Although Andrew has <strong>consistently denied any wrongdoing</strong>, the emergence of new testimony and correspondence has revived speculation about his involvement and whether he could face further reputational damage.</p>

<h3><strong>Public Opinion and Royal Image</strong></h3>

<p>Royal commentators say the Palace is in a difficult position. While King Charles III has worked to modernize and streamline the monarchy, any inaction regarding Andrew could undermine ongoing efforts to maintain public trust.</p>

<blockquote>
<p>&ldquo;The public mood is shifting again,&rdquo; said royal historian <strong>Dr. Sarah Hewson</strong>. &ldquo;While the Palace hoped the issue had settled, each new revelation keeps the scandal alive. The institution risks long-term reputational harm if it doesn&rsquo;t act decisively.&rdquo;</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Polls suggest that a majority of Britons support stripping Andrew of all remaining titles, with younger voters particularly critical of the monarchy&rsquo;s handling of the issue.</p>

<h3><strong>Legal Context and Future Steps</strong></h3>

<p>While no criminal charges are currently pending against Prince Andrew, legal experts note that ongoing lawsuits in the U.S. could lead to further disclosures. Some MPs have even proposed legislation that would allow Parliament to revoke royal titles in extreme cases without requiring royal consent.</p>

<p>The <strong>Royal Titles (Removal) Bill</strong>, introduced by Labour MP Rachael Maskell in 2023, has gained renewed attention in light of the latest revelations. If passed, it would empower Parliament to recommend title removal where an individual&rsquo;s behavior &ldquo;seriously damages the integrity of the Crown.&rdquo;</p>

<h3><strong>Palace Response</strong></h3>

<p>A <strong>Buckingham Palace spokesperson</strong> declined to comment directly on the latest reports, stating only that the Duke of York &ldquo;continues to refrain from public duties and remains committed to private life.&rdquo;</p>

<p>Despite the Palace&rsquo;s silence, the issue is expected to dominate royal discussions in the coming weeks, especially as King Charles continues his push for a &ldquo;slimmer, more accountable monarchy.&rdquo;</p>

<p>For now, Prince Andrew remains largely out of the public eye, residing at <strong>Royal Lodge in Windsor</strong>, though his name continues to cast a shadow over the royal family&rsquo;s public image and reform agenda.</p>